This is unfortunately another example of disingenuous reporting um where you have a reporter who took the chief of staff’s words wildly out of context did not include the context those conversations were had within. Uh and then further I think the most egregious part of this article was the bias of om omission that was clearly present and we see a lot of this when dealing with the media every day. You will leave out important context, leave out comments and facts. you know, many people in this building spoke with that reporter and those comments um were never included in the story, probably because it didn’t push this false narrative of of chaos and confusion that the reporter was clearly trying to push. So, what I’ll say about our chief of staff, as you’ve seen from not just myself, but also the entire cabinet in a ground swell of support from people on Capitol Hill who don’t even work in this building about how incredible Susie Wilds has been um to President Trump. And he’s been able to accomplish so much because of his leadership and his tenacity, but also because of Chief of Staff Wilds’s leadership uh and her ability to effectuate his agenda.
